From: Jérôme Benoit Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 11:33:53 +0000 (+0100) Subject: docs: remove node-worker-threads-pool from benchmarks README X-Git-Tag: v3.1.11~5 X-Git-Url: https://git.piment-noir.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2688c5264b768a3cb6d6f32a804e0382847e98f8;p=poolifier.git docs: remove node-worker-threads-pool from benchmarks README Signed-off-by: Jérôme Benoit --- diff --git a/benchmarks/README.md b/benchmarks/README.md index 2dabdbf1..e784f1c2 100644 --- a/benchmarks/README.md +++ b/benchmarks/README.md @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ We chose to use this tool because it allows to run isolated Node.js processes so - [tinypool](https://github.com/tinylibs/tinypool) - [workerpool](https://github.com/josdejong/workerpool) - [worker-nodes](https://github.com/allegro/node-worker-nodes) - - [node-worker-threads-pool](https://github.com/SUCHMOKUO/node-worker-threads-pool) - [nanothreads](https://github.com/snuffyDev/nanothreads) Those are our results: @@ -26,8 +25,7 @@ We chose to use this tool because it allows to run isolated Node.js processes so - External pools with which we used to compare the poolifier results: - - + - [node-worker-threads-pool](https://github.com/SUCHMOKUO/node-worker-threads-pool): removed because it does not support dynamic modules import or import outside the task function. The task function is expected to be self-contained, which makes it difficult to use in real world application without ugly hacks. - [worker-threads-pool](https://github.com/watson/worker-threads-pool): removed because unmaintained since more than 4 years. - [threadwork](https://github.com/kevlened/threadwork): removed because unmaintained since more than 3 years. - [microjob](https://github.com/wilk/microjob): removed because unmaintained since more than 5 years.